Gigabit Speeds for R5 a Day: Inside Fibertime's Township Fibre Network
TechCentral clocked 1Gbit/s download on Fibertime's Alexandra network in June - ten times the operator's own "up to 100 Mbps" marketing - while the pay-as-you-go fibre operator races toward a million connected township homes. Here's what's verified, what isn't, and whether R5-a-day actually beats a monthly contract.

In this article(11)
- 01A R5 voucher, and a gigabit fibre line in Alexandra
- 02A note on where these numbers come from
- 03What TechCentral actually measured
- 04How R5-a-day fibre actually works
- 05From pilot to (almost) a million homes
- 06Why we won't quote a single "homes connected" number
- 07R5 a day vs a monthly contract: the real numbers
- 08Who this actually helps - and who should look elsewhere
- 09The honest caveats
- 10The practical takeaway
- 11Frequently asked questions
A R5 voucher, and a gigabit fibre line in Alexandra
On 26 June 2026, TechCentral ran a speed test on Fibertime's fibre network in Alexandra, Johannesburg - one of the townships where the pay-as-you-go operator sells uncapped internet access for R5 a day. The advertised tier on that network is up to 100 Mbps. What the test actually measured was 1 Gbit/s download, 560 Mbit/s upload, and 14ms latency - roughly ten times the marketed number, and squarely gigabit-class performance, on a network built for households earning too little to qualify for most monthly fibre contracts.
We've already covered how Fibertime's daily pricing stacks up against Vumatel's Vuma Key in our prepaid fibre showdown, and the broader mechanics of township fibre in our prepaid and township fibre guide. This piece is about what's new: a real, independently-measured performance result that undercuts the operator's own marketing (in the reader's favour), set against Fibertime's rapid - and only partially verifiable - expansion toward a million connected homes.
A note on where these numbers come from
Every figure in this article is tagged to the specific source and date it came from, rather than blended into a single "current" number. Two access problems shaped how we reported this: mybroadband.co.za returned an access-denied response to every automated request today, so its coverage of Fibertime could not be directly verified and isn't cited here; and fibertime.com (and fibertime.co.za, which redirects to it) sits behind a bot-verification wall that returned no content, so we could not pull a live, first-party homes-connected figure directly from the company today. Where secondary sources disagree - as they do on total homes connected - we've shown the disagreement in a table below rather than picking a number.
What TechCentral actually measured
Speed-test results on any single network, on any single day, are a snapshot, not a guarantee - but this one is worth taking seriously because it was run independently, by a publication with no commercial relationship to Fibertime, against the operator's own published tier.
| Metric | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Advertised tier | 100 Mbps | Fibertime's headline marketed speed |
| Measured download | 1 Gbit/s | TechCentral's own speed test, Alexandra network |
| Measured upload | 560 Mbps | Same test, same session |
| Measured latency | 14 ms | Real fibre-grade responsiveness, not wireless |
TechCentral's report is also explicit that this isn't universal: Fibertime's separate network in Kayamandi, outside Stellenbosch, is reported to top out at 250 Mbps - still well ahead of the advertised 100 Mbps ceiling, but nowhere near Alexandra's measured gigabit. The honest reading is that Fibertime appears to be under-promising and over-delivering on raw throughput in at least some areas, likely because it's provisioning genuine FTTH capacity ahead of the conservative tier it actually markets and bills against - not that every Fibertime connection in the country runs at a gigabit.
How R5-a-day fibre actually works
Fibertime is real fibre-to-the-home, not a shared wireless hotspot: a fibre line is run to a shared access point or directly to participating homes, and connectivity is sold in 24-hour blocks rather than monthly contracts or capped data bundles.
- Price: R5 buys 24 hours of uncapped, unshaped access. There's no monthly fee, no bundle to run out of - you're paying for time, not gigabytes.
- No contract, no credit check: vouchers are bought at spaza shops and informal traders in the coverage area, or topped up through the Fibertime app, linked to a cellphone number rather than a bank account or ID.
- Hardware: a Wi-Fi router is provided at signup - the Nokia partnership specifically funds Wi-Fi 6 ONTs (optical network terminals) for this role.
- Lapses without penalty: like Vuma Key, missing a day simply pauses the connection rather than triggering a debt or fee - you resume by buying another voucher whenever you need to.
The pitch is squarely aimed at households that mobile data pricing and monthly fibre contracts both price out: no deposit, no proof of income, no 24- or 30-month commitment, and no cost at all on days you don't use it.
From pilot to (almost) a million homes
Fibertime's public funding and partnership history, in the companies' own words, shows a business scaling quickly - if not always with fully reconcilable numbers along the way. Finnfund's public materials confirm an initial €2 million investment in 2023, though no specific date for that round has been published.
- 11 November 2024Nokia signs on as network partner
Nokia announces a target of 1.5 million Fibertime customers over five years, with 500,000 Wi-Fi 6 ONTs to be deployed over 36 months on Nokia Lightspan FX OLTs and the Altiplano access controller.
- 3 March 2025Finnfund's follow-on investment
The Finnish development finance institution puts in a further €2 million, on top of an initial €2 million in 2023. Finnfund states roughly 65,000 homes were connected at the time, with a stated ambition of reaching up to 1.8 million homes.
- 15 May 2026Fibertime targets 1 million homes by mid-2027
ITWeb reports Fibertime has connected approximately 420,000 homes across 13 cities in 7 provinces, with founder Alan Knott-Craig Jr. setting a public target of 1 million connected homes by mid-2027.
- 26 June 2026TechCentral speed-tests the Alexandra network
Against an advertised 100 Mbps tier, TechCentral records 1 Gbit/s download, 560 Mbit/s upload and 14ms latency on Fibertime's Johannesburg township network. Its Kayamandi (Stellenbosch) network is separately reported to top out at 250 Mbit/s, underlining that results vary by site.
| Date | Milestone | What happened |
|---|---|---|
| 11 November 2024 | Nokia signs on as network partner | Nokia announces a target of 1.5 million Fibertime customers over five years, with 500,000 Wi-Fi 6 ONTs to be deployed over 36 months on Nokia Lightspan FX OLTs and the Altiplano access controller. |
| 3 March 2025 | Finnfund's follow-on investment | The Finnish development finance institution puts in a further €2 million, on top of an initial €2 million in 2023. Finnfund states roughly 65,000 homes were connected at the time, with a stated ambition of reaching up to 1.8 million homes. |
| 15 May 2026 | Fibertime targets 1 million homes by mid-2027 | ITWeb reports Fibertime has connected approximately 420,000 homes across 13 cities in 7 provinces, with founder Alan Knott-Craig Jr. setting a public target of 1 million connected homes by mid-2027. |
| 26 June 2026 | TechCentral speed-tests the Alexandra network | Against an advertised 100 Mbps tier, TechCentral records 1 Gbit/s download, 560 Mbit/s upload and 14ms latency on Fibertime's Johannesburg township network. Its Kayamandi (Stellenbosch) network is separately reported to top out at 250 Mbit/s, underlining that results vary by site. |
Why we won't quote a single "homes connected" number
South African fibre and tech coverage tends to repeat whichever homes-connected figure was most recently quoted, without noting how old it is or where it came from. We think that's worse than being explicit about the gap, so here's every figure we could trace, with its source and date:
| Source | Date | Figure cited | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Finnfund press release | 3 Mar 2025 | ~65,000 homes | Stated at the time of Finnfund's follow-on investment; first-party (investor). |
| ITWeb, quoting founder Alan Knott-Craig Jr. | 15 May 2026 | ~420,000 homes across 13 cities, 7 provinces | Most recent figure we could trace to an on-record company quote. |
| Various June–July 2026 aggregator coverage | Jun–Jul 2026 | Figures cited from 470,000–500,000 | Could not verify against a first-party source as of 1 Aug 2026 — fibertime.com sits behind a bot-verification wall that returned no content. |
The honest summary: Fibertime was growing quickly through mid-2026, and its own stated ambition - 1 million homes by mid-2027 - implies continued fast growth from the ~420,000-home figure it gave ITWeb in May. But we can't currently verify a more recent number against a source we trust, so we're not printing one.
R5 a day vs a monthly contract: the real numbers
Pay-as-you-go pricing sounds cheap because R5 is a small number, but it only beats a monthly product if you don't use it every day. Here's the arithmetic against Vuma Key, Vumatel's own prepaid product at a flat R99/month (about R3.30/day):
| Usage pattern | Fibertime cost | Vuma Key cost | Cheaper option |
|---|---|---|---|
| Every day, all 30 days | R150 | R99 | Vuma Key, by R51/month |
| 20 days a month | R100 | R99 | Roughly even |
| 10 days a month (weekend/occasional use) | R50 | R99 | Fibertime, by R49/month |
| 3 days a month (rare/seasonal use) | R15 | R99 | Fibertime, by R84/month |
If your household is online every day - work-from-home, school-age kids doing homework, daily streaming - a flat monthly product almost always wins on price, and Vuma Key's entry tier or a full uncapped fibre line from any ISP on our live fibre deals comparison will cost less per month than paying daily. Fibertime's real advantage is for households whose usage is genuinely occasional: weekends only, school holidays, or homes with no reliable income to commit to a recurring debit order at all.
Who this actually helps - and who should look elsewhere
Should you actually switch to Fibertime?
The gigabit headline is real news, but it doesn't change the underlying economics of daily vs monthly pricing.
- Q1
Do you already have an uncapped monthly fibre line or a mobile data deal you're happy with?
- Yes → Fibertime isn't solving a problem you currently have - there's no reason to switch on speed alone.
- No → Keep going - the next questions matter more than the gigabit headline.
- Q2
Is your household online every single day - work, school, streaming?
- Yes → A monthly product will almost always beat R5/day on cost. Compare Vuma Key and full uncapped fibre lines.
- No, it's occasional or seasonal → This is exactly what pay-as-you-go pricing is built for - you only pay on the days you actually use it.
- Q3
Can you pass a credit check or commit to a monthly debit order?
- No → Fibertime and Vuma Key both skip credit checks and contracts entirely - either is worth checking in your area.
- Yes, that's not a barrier → You have more products to choose from - weigh Fibertime's occasional-use pricing against a full contract on speed and reliability.
- Q4
Does Fibertime's network reach your area yet?
- Unsure → Coverage is still limited to specific townships and cities - check via the Fibertime app or a local spaza vendor before assuming it's available.
- No, it isn't available here → See what else covers your address on our coverage map.
The honest caveats
A few things this story doesn't prove, worth saying plainly:
- One gigabit result on one network, on one day, is not a nationwide performance guarantee - Kayamandi's own reported 250 Mbps ceiling on the same operator shows real site-to-site variation.
- We could not verify a current, first-party homes-connected total today - treat any single figure you see quoted elsewhere with the same scepticism we've applied here.
- "Uncapped" during an active 24-hour window doesn't mean unlimited forever - like any fibre product, check whether your specific network applies fair-use shaping at peak times.
- Fibertime is genuinely FTTH, not a shared neighbourhood wireless mesh - but your experience still depends on how many other households share the same access point or local exchange capacity.
The practical takeaway
The gigabit result is a genuinely good sign for Fibertime's network quality - it suggests the underlying fibre infrastructure has real headroom, not that the operator is stretching a thin connection to its limit. But it doesn't change the basic economics: R5-a-day pricing is built for occasional and seasonal use, and a household online every day will still do better on a flat monthly product, whether that's Vuma Key at R99/month or a full uncapped line from any ISP on our live comparison. If your usage really is occasional, or you can't get past a credit check for a traditional contract, Fibertime remains one of the few genuinely no-commitment fibre options in South Africa - just don't assume the homes-connected number you've seen quoted elsewhere is current.
Frequently asked questions
Help someone else pick the right fibre
Related insights

Vuma Key vs Fibertime: SA's Prepaid Fibre Showdown (2026)
Read article
Prepaid & Township Fibre Explained: Vuma Key, Fibertime & Pay-As-You-Go
Read article
